Mr. Mean:
I watched the VH1 Classic documentary called Metal Evolution the
other night. The episode was about thrash metal, so I was immediately hooked.
It got me thinking about something. All of the “big 4” succumbed to making more
accessible records, but Slayer was the only band that really kept it more akin
to the sound of thrash metal. Even bands like Exodus, Overkill, and Testament
kind of abandoned the sound later on. Besides the usual “major label” push to
make more accessible sounding albums, does the fact that these guys are much
older now (pushing or just over 50) mean they cannot play like they used to and
therefore have to change their style a bit. I don’t play an instrument, so
maybe this is a dumb question. But, I was watching Slayer perform “Raining Blood”
on the recent tour and Dave Lombardo just does not have the speed he used to
have. He can still outplay any of his peers (up yours, Lars), but the dude is
older now.
Also, one more thing Mr. On’ry…why do you hate Anthrax so much?
Vocals? I have a hard time with that because King Diamond sings higher than
Joey Belladonna any day and you love his stuff. Please tell me you at least
love S.O.D.
M. On’ry:
First of all, have you actually listened to anything Slayer has
put out since Divine Intervention (1994)? It’s all garbage and is
absolutely more accessible to the fans of all that frat-core, mainstream,
Slipknot-loving, chugga-chugga crap. So before you heap all this praise
on Slayer for staying “true” I’d be very careful. Sure they didn’t go
full on ‘mainstream’ like Metallica but you could argue that a) they softened
their sound just like all the others you mentioned and b) Megadeth has done an
equal job with them trying to stay as true to their sound as possible (which
really is another indictment of Slayer’s last 15+ years of output).
Anthrax. Let’s get
one thing straight first. I don’t “hate” Anthrax. I just think they
are extremely overrated and I could give you literally 25+ thrash bands from
that era that did it better. The vocals don’t bother me as much as the
fact that a) they weren’t as good as people made them out to be and b) they
helped invent nu-metal the day they stepped on stage with Public Enemy (whom I
actually like a lot better than Anthrax btw) and for that I can never forgive
them.
Mr. Mean:
Feisty right out of the gate! If you’re calling Among The Living
overrated, you are nuts.
Mr. On’ry
The only truly redeeming thing about any Anthrax record is that
they actually worked with Angelo Badalamenti on their Twin Peaks homage song
“Black Lodge”. Everything else is fine but completely over-shadowed by
Metallica, Megadeth, Slayer, Testament, Possessed, Exodus, Kreator, Overkill,
Tankard, Whiplash, etc., etc. etc. Want me to keep going? Again I
never said they suck they just aren’t as good as everyone made them out to
be. Scott Ian has this cult of personality around him that people/fans
would gravitate to and ignore the fact that he’s one of the most overrated
guitar players in metal history.
Mr. Mean:
Wrong. Scott Ian has some great riffs dude. He’s got the whole
NYHC vibe and I dig that about their (old) sound. They were as crossover as
D.R.I. and Crumbsuckers. I listen to their Megaforce period between ‘85-‘90 and
I can totally see them playing a matinee HC show at CBs or something. A bill
with Anthrax and Cro-Mags would be damned good in NYC.
Mr. Lonesome:
Me hating thrash is a big misnomer. I just don’t enjoy as much as
the heavy, melodic, down-tempo stuff (and yes, I’m referring to a band like
Sabbath).
Mr Mean – I’m actually the one that hates Belladonna-era Anthrax.
I don’t think they are as good as a “Big Four” ranking serves them. Though they
do get mad props for writing a song about the Black Lodge. And I think Scott
Ian is a pretty funny fella. I just think they are good for NYC. But Thrash is
undeniably West Coast to me.
One band I love, be hometown biased or not, is Flotsam &
Jetsam. I think their early thrash records are is good as anyone’s.
And to your earlier point, yes. Age can definitely affect one’s
playing ability, especially in a genre such as Thrash. But even in a genre like
good ol’ Rhythm and Blues. I saw Chuck Berry a few years back in CT. His voice
was on point. But his playing was incredibly sloppy. And as the show went on,
you could hear his amp being turned down more and more to where it wasn’t even
audible.
I’d say a 70 year old Rhythm & Blues guitarist is pretty
akin to a 50 year old Thrash guitarist.
Mr. Mean:
I figured you would like Belladonna since you are such a Geoff
Tate fan. Very similar. I love Anthrax with Belladonna, and I love Armored
Saint with Bush. Together, no. At least it wasn’t as bad as John Corabi in
Motley Crue. The big deal about Anthrax with John Bush is that they went away
from their thashing and went all melodic. Sound of White Noise is their Black
Album. That said, Black Lodge kicks. But so does Enter Sandman.
I liked Flotsam & Jetsam’s early Metal Blade stuff. When they
signed to MCA, horrible. Then again, Newkid was gone.
Mr. Lonesome:
And not surprisingly, Sound of White Noise is the only Anthrax
album I own. “Potter’s Field,” “Only,” “Packaged Rebellion,” “Room For One
More” are all really great tracks.
I just don’t think Belladonna is anywhere near someone like Tate.
Personal taste, though. They had some riffs that were cool. I just don’t see
them as being worthy musically. Though they do get credit for being
instrumental in the early Thrash scene by giving Metallica a place to
crash ;o)
Mr. Mean:
When Metallica came to NY is when they signed with Elektra, I
think. “Only” was a pretty good song, too. I may pick that cd up for a penny or
something on Amazon. It’s got some moments that are worth $2.98 total with
shipping.
Mr. Lonesome:
Elektra re-issued it in 1988, but originally it was recorded with
Jon Zazula as one of the producers.
Mr. Mean:
Sound Of White Noise was 1993 dude. What the hell are you talking
about?
Mr. Lonesome:
I’m talking about Metallica, idiot. You said “when Metallica came
to NY is when they signed with Elektra.” If your “they” was Antrax, you need to
be more clear.
Mr. Mean:
Let’s decipher this since you are the one who is clearly stupid.
You said: Though they (Anthrax) do get credit for being
instrumental in the early Thrash scene by giving Metallica a place to
crash ;o)
I said: When Metallica came to NY is when they signed with
Elektra, I think
NY is where Anthrax lives. I was commenting on your stupid post.
Onward…I mentioned: “Only” was a pretty good song, too. I may pick
that cd up for a penny or something on Amazon. It’s got some moments that are
worth $2.98 total with shipping.
Clearly this is about the Anthrax album. Not any Metallica album.
Both bands had albums on Elektra; Sound of White Noise was Anthrax’s first for
Elektra since leaving Island.
You then said: Elektra re-issued it in 1988, but originally it was
recorded with Jon Zazula as one of the producers.
You are the idiot. First of all, Metallica signed to Elektra in
1984 and their first major label release was Master Of Puppets. Nothing was
re-issued in 1988 except for the Megaforce albums Kill ‘em All and Ride The
Lightning, so duh, Zazula.
Where the hell is the other guy?
(*editors note: Mr. On'ry decided at this point to sit back and watch the idiocy unfold for a few minutes...)
Mr. Lonesome:
Man, you are dense. We were clearly talking about how Anthrax
helped Metallica when Metallica needed a place to stay while recording Kill ‘Em
All in NYC for Megaforce Records in Rochester in 1983 with Zazula as a
producer.
Mr. Mean:
That’s not what we originally said you moron! All I said was that
I think that is how they met the people at Elektra. I don’t know for certain.
You never mentioned Kill Em All, Megaforce or Zazula once…until now. You
misread what I wrote and completely didn’t understand that I was talking about
effing Sound Of White Noise!
Once again, we talk about Metallica, and we argue. Next subject.
Let’s discuss how I am going to kick you in the marbles when I see you again.
Mr. Lonesome:
But your comment about NY was directly after I mentioned how
Anthrax let them crash when they got to NY (which was to record Kill ‘Em All). Then you brought up Elektra. So you are dumb.
Mr. Mean:
I get it dumdum, but in your original post below, you never
mentioned Kill Em All. I brought up Elektra because I thought, THOUGHT, they
met Metallica when they were in NY. Either way, I am going to kick you.
Mr. Lonesome:
Either way, YOU are dumb.
Mr. Mean:
Why am I dumb? Because you bring up tidbits after the fact to
clean up your mess and your misunderstanding? Clearly I am dumb then because I
made you type stuff out half-assed.
Mr. Lonesome:
Because we were directly talking about Metallica being in NY, and
you said you didn’t think they went to NY until they signed with Elektra. I was
throwing down the knowledge that they came to NY prior to signing with Elektra.
It’s that simple.
Mr. On’ry:
I stand by my original statement that Anthrax are overrated.
Again, you want “crossover” bands I’ll take D.R.I., Cryptic Slaughter, Crumbsuckers
and about a half dozen other bands who did it better than Anthrax. End of
story. And as for you two arguing semantics you both just sound like 7
year olds. Moving on…
Mr. Lonesome:
He sounds 7. I’m at least 8 or 9.
I'll just post about stuff I disagree with -
ReplyDelete"M. On’ry:
First of all, have you actually listened to anything Slayer has put out since Divine Intervention (1994)? It’s all garbage and is absolutely more accessible to the fans of all that frat-core, mainstream, Slipknot-loving, chugga-chugga crap."
My take: Diabolus in Musica was crap. God Hates Us All was not crap, but it was forced. Christ Illusion is a real thrash record but it's mediocre. World Painted Blood? Best Slayer album since Seasons, a real thrash record with solid playing. Anything but Fratcore.
"Mr. Mean:
All of the “big 4” succumbed to making more accessible records, but Slayer was the only band that really kept it more akin to the sound of thrash metal. Even bands like Exodus, Overkill, and Testament kind of abandoned the sound later on."
All of the above bands you mentioned are once again playing thrash. Out of those 3, Testament was the one that was all over the place in the early 90s, dabbling in Metallica/Megadeth "accessible groove" and then 5-6 years later, trying out some death metal sounds.
"Mr. Mean: But, I was watching Slayer perform “Raining Blood” on the recent tour and Dave Lombardo just does not have the speed he used to have. He can still outplay any of his peers (up yours, Lars), but the dude is older now."
No, he's as fast as ever. He just isn't as "triggered" or metronome-perfect as you might expect. However, in terms of pure speed, Charlie Benante of Anthrax can compete, easily, in terms of the "veteran" bands.
Other notes:
Metallica signed with Metal Force just before departing for NYC, where Kill 'Em All was recorded. The Elektra deal was worked out just as Ride The Lightning was ready to go out the door (late '84/early '85). MoP was indeed their first album with full major label backing.
Anyone who can name "25" thrash bands that made better records than Anthrax's Spreading the Disease ('85) and Among the Living ('87) is delusional. Yes, Anthrax's career is mired in bad lineup decisions, poor taste of tours, erratic inconsistencies, their "progressive" moment (Persistence of Time) being followed up immediately by their rap/metal crossover with P.E.(confusing the fuck out of their fans), etc, etc. But those 2 records are on par with just about anything from that time period. "A.I.R" makes me break shit whenever I hear it.
The "age" thing - yes, it effects some bands, but, a handful of those bands used to play hammered/stoned and are now playing sober, so sometimes, you don't notice a difference. Scott Ian now is just as good as Scott Ian 30 years ago through the wonders of modern medicine and clean living. Until his recent injuries, the same could be said for Dave Mustaine. However, someone like Kerry King (who notoriously played every Slayer gig ever completely sober) now is a bit sloppier and slower because...
#1. Hanneman is the better player and people have noticed King's deficiencies without him around.
#2. Since King isn't any more "sober" live, it's a natural process to get a bit worse at his age.
There's no excuse for Metallica, but I will say that Kirk Hammett has sounded good the last 2 times I've seen him. Lars is awful by modern metal standards and mediocre compared to his own late 80s performances. Hetfield isn't bad, but he is known to "cheat" on his riffs, probably due to old age..... however, he is sober now.
Thoughts?
Great comment, but dude, it is Megaforce, not Metal Force. It happens.
ReplyDeleteTouche. I'm so METAL I couldn't even type the label right. You know what I meant.
ReplyDeleteflotsam and jetsam? and THIS is why i adore you mr lonesome. i did backstage work in musical theater with someone in flotsam and jetsam's parents. i pretend it was jason.
ReplyDeleteI've seen Flotsam more times than any other band, every time with the immortal Simon Kennedy by my side.
Delete