Gentlemen.
Two weeks ago, I
announced that Iron Maiden surpassed Black Sabbath as my favorite metal
band. Today, I’m here to say my brain is like the BCS rankings and
Sabbath is again in the #1 spot.
In honor of their awesomeness, I want to have a detailed discussion on Black Sabbath.
I’ll start, by explaining how they fell back into the #1 spot for me: I listened to them.
With all the greats,
there is no denying the genius of riffs. It’s why we listen and love in
the first place. But for me, there are more Maiden songs I can skip over
than Sabbath songs. And that consistency of
awesomeness maintains their legacy. Sure, we can talk about their
innovation, coming out dark and heavy when no one else was doing it. But
just because the Wright Bros flew a plane for, what, 14 seconds, it
doesn’t mean they rode that same plane for the next
couple decades. Sabbath came out, introduced something interesting and,
frankly, needed, and they continued to pummel.
We keep listening
because of the music, its sustainability, its ability to carry over and
maintain relevancy to this day. It doesn’t sound dated: it sounds like
G-d banging drums eternal.
I’d like to get into Ozzy and RJD solo too, but please throw your initial thoughts.
Mr. Mean:
So, I go back and forth
a bit on things related to Sabbath for a number of reasons. First of
all, yes, they were great, they were pioneers, they were the first,
yadda yadda. I just can’t consider them metal,
therefore not in the same league as Maiden. Sabbath was a hard
blues/rock band. The term heavy metal, at the time, was thrown
everywhere there were loud guitars, whether it was Hendrix, Clapton, Led
Zep, Blue Cheer, even freakin’ Vanilla Fudge was deemed heavy
metal. It was hard, loud, dark rock and blues. Sabbath was signed to a
newly formed PROGRESSIVE ROCK label called Vertigo, so at the time, they
were pretty much deemed prog. “21st Century Schizoid Man”
came out in ’69 and is “metal” sounding, too.
The lines between blues/rock, prog, and metal all blurred. Heavy metal,
as far as I am concerned, started with Priest. If I had to pick my
favorite METAL band, it’s Iron Maiden, with Priest not far behind. Out
of the “big 3” proto metal bands, Sabbath is my
favorite, then Deep Purple, and Zeppelin is far distant fourth behind
Sir Lord Baltimore.
Musically, they just
got better and better. The problem is that the production got crappier.
Sabbath Bloody Sabbath should be godlike, but the production leaves it
so thin and makes me wonder what it could be
like in the annals of rock history had it sounded remotely good.
Another factor about them, from Ozzy to RJD, is that the first four
Sabbath albums are brilliant and the first two with RJD are right there
with them. The last four Ozzy ones are good, not great.
Mr. Lonesome:
Oh, where to begin.
Ok – let’s just agree
to disagree with the definition of metal. In retrospect, I think we can
deem what was and what wasn’t metal. Hendrix, Clapton, etc, they were
not metal. Sabbath absolutely was. They exceeded
“hard rock/blues” by using one very instrumental element: the power
chord. That’s right there is generally what separates a metal band from a
hard rock band (specifically, bands with slow-medium tempos. Thrash and
Prog, etc. are a whole different discussion
on theory, mainly because they are more influence by classical music
than blues).
Also, Sir Lord F’ing Baltimore over Zep?
Jesus.Mr. Mean:
Sorry gents, I just do not like Led Zeppelin that much. They are merely ok to me. Sir Lord Baltimore was fricking amazing.
Mr. On'ry:
I don't even know where to begin with some of this lunacy so I'll try to go chronologically here.
First and foremost anyone who says Black Sabbath isn't a metal band is a f*cking moron. Period. The first notes from the first album trickled out of Satan's orifices straight to Iommi's stubs and reinvented everything heavy that came after it. Saying Sabbath isn't metal because of the time period they recorded is like saying the person who invented the wheel doesn't count because the wheel wasn't on a car. It has no logic to it at all. Now if you want to call bands like Sir Lord Balitomore, Deep Purple, Blue Cheer, Pentagram, etc. "proto-metal" as is popular today and deem Judas Priest as the first "pure" heavy metal" band I'm o.k. with that. But Sabbath IS metal and I could even argue that their first seven albums are more "metal" than the first three Priest records (and certainly the first two albums with Dio are). Priest didn't start playing "metal" until, what, maybe Stained Class in 1978 and everything they did before that was also pretty much "blues based, prog influenced rock". Sooooo...that theory is shot to piss as well. Oh and are you one of those guys that runs around saying that bands on labels like, say, Alternative Tentacles couldn't be metal because they weren't on a "metal label"? Because that's a pretty silly argument as well.
Secondly, we've had this discussion multiple times about the album Sabbath, Bloody Sabbath specifically. I actually listened to a handful of songs off that record yesterday. With the exception of the song Sabbra Cadabra (which has an inexplicably low mix that drives me nuts as well) the production on this album is not lacking. I really don't know what the eff you are talking about. I'm pretty sure that all that bad dance music you listen to has crapped up your hearing because Sabbath, Bloody Sabbath is one of the greatest records ever made. EVER. The songs on that album are so innovative and so talent filled that they could have smeared dog crap all over the speakers and then recorded it in a cardboard box layered with tin foil and it would STILL sound like gold. Sometimes you have to just stop being a music snob and appreciate a masterpiece for what it is.
I mean seriously, do you need me to make you a mix tape with all the Sabbath songs that will prove my point that they weren't just another "hard blues/rock band". Because I will...and it will make you cry at your own stupidity.
And Mr. Lonesome, stop knocking Sir Lord Baltimore until you actually listen to them because they are one of the most underrated bands in rock history. Led Zeppelin is fantastic and I love, love, love the first four records but they put out just as many crap records loaded with filler as they did classics. I've personally had enough of the blind Zeppelin worship that dominates most music circles.
![]() |
| The album that started metal...unless you are Mr. Mean, then you're a moron. |
Mr. Lonesome:
Just a quick note on Zep: I do not worship them blindly. I worship them “Boogie With Stu” and all.
Back to Sabbath: I
touched on power chords, be there are other elements of theory that
characterize “Heavy Metal.” Specifically, the diminished fifth (used as
the main riff in “Black Sabbath”) – and Chip nailed
it, because the chord (or tri-tone) is known as The Devil’s Chord. So,
yes. It totally came “out of Satan’s orifices.”
Mr. On'ry:
I'm sorry, let me refrain. I don't think YOU worship Zeppelin blindly. But a lot of people do...and it's annoying. That is all I have to say about that.
Mr. Mean:
Ouch, that last line hurt there. Because, you know, all I listen to is electronic music. Morons.
My feelings are hurt now. Well, not really.
OK, fine, valid points
on Priest’s records before Stained Class, but since I pretty much hate
subsubsubsubgenres anyway, whatever. They’re a rock band, they all are,
so take the inverted cross out of your backside.
When I think of metal, I think of Priest and Maiden first.
And dude, I like SBS.
It’s a huge step creatively for them, I am well aware of that. But it is
so thin. I hate the sound of that album. You are so gaga over Sabbath
that, yes, it could be a dog crap in a cardboard
box and you would still think it is the best thing ever made. You’re
blind wrong though.
No I don’t need a
Sabbath comp, moron. I have them all through Born Again. Unlike the
other knobhead here who buys digital songs from albums, I buy full
length albums. I have heard them all because I own them
all. Make a comp for some dumb kid who thinks POD is metal.
THE BEATLES. Idiots.
Mr. On'ry:
You know I love you like a brother. I can put up with your Morrissey worship, your blinding hatred of the Beatles, your love of crappy dance music...but you struck a nerve when you said Sabbath wasn't metal because to me (and this is just me being me here) it sounded like the dumbest thing any one of us has ever said on this blog...even dumber than 90% of what comes out of Lonesome's mouth. Ha!
And I'm not "Sabbath blind" so to speak. I don't like the entire second half of Never Say Die. I don't own anything past Mob Rules. So there.
Oh and the inverted cross stays wherever Satan planted it because it clearly makes me more metal than all of you.
Lastly, if this devolves into a Beatles conversation I swear to the Old Scratch himself I quit.
![]() |
| This cover depicts what's going to happen to Mean the next time On'ry sees him... |
Mr. Lonesome:
Speaking of Deep Purple, I think it’s safe to say Gillan was a bad choice to sing for Sabbath.
Mr. Mean:
I like Born Again. The
problem, once again, is bad production. WTF is your obsession with
hating Gillan? The dude has pipes. You are such an idiot.
Mr. On'ry:
We shall agree to disagree. And by "agree to disagree" what I meant was I am right and you are an idiot and the next time I see you I'm going to uncomfortably rub my Black Sabbath tattoo in your face.
Mr. Lonesome:
I also believe On'ry is right.
And so am I.
And dude – I have
nothing against Gillan, or Deep Purple. I just don’t think either are as
great as you do. The world won’t stop spinning.
Mr. Mean:
You both are idiots.
*So tell us in the comments - Are Black Sabbath "metal"? Are Led Zeppelin overrated? Can we go one God forsaken post without mentioning the Beatles?






